unique constraint for registry_item - fixes #1121
we remove all duplicate items from the registry, keeping the most-recently updated one (which presumably is the one that the users expect to be used) then we use `upsert` instead of the more complicated previous logic, which was subject to races
This commit is contained in:
parent
a4c0ef824c
commit
3aa5ec713c
3 changed files with 32 additions and 29 deletions
|
|
@ -27,34 +27,18 @@ export class RegistryApiService {
|
|||
public async set(userId: MiUser['id'], domain: string | null, scope: string[], key: string, value: any) {
|
||||
// TODO: 作成できるキーの数を制限する
|
||||
|
||||
const query = this.registryItemsRepository.createQueryBuilder('item');
|
||||
if (domain) {
|
||||
query.where('item.domain = :domain', { domain: domain });
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
query.where('item.domain IS NULL');
|
||||
}
|
||||
query.andWhere('item.userId = :userId', { userId: userId });
|
||||
query.andWhere('item.key = :key', { key: key });
|
||||
query.andWhere('item.scope = :scope', { scope: scope });
|
||||
|
||||
const existingItem = await query.getOne();
|
||||
|
||||
if (existingItem) {
|
||||
await this.registryItemsRepository.update(existingItem.id, {
|
||||
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
||||
value: value,
|
||||
});
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
await this.registryItemsRepository.insert({
|
||||
id: this.idService.gen(),
|
||||
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
||||
userId: userId,
|
||||
domain: domain,
|
||||
scope: scope,
|
||||
key: key,
|
||||
value: value,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
await this.registryItemsRepository.upsert({
|
||||
id: this.idService.gen(),
|
||||
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
||||
userId: userId,
|
||||
domain: domain,
|
||||
scope: scope,
|
||||
key: key,
|
||||
value: value,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
conflictPaths: ['userId', 'key', 'scope', 'domain'],
|
||||
upsertType: 'on-conflict-do-update',
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (domain == null) {
|
||||
// TODO: サードパーティアプリが傍受出来てしまうのでどうにかする
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue